Tulane professor tied to pro-Confederate groups
April 29, 2021
According to an investigation conducted by The Tulane Hullabaloo, Richard Marksbury, dean emeritus and current associate professor, has affiliations with pro-Confederate monument groups.
As of 2017, Marksbury was an active member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. In 2019, Marksbury also served as a guest lecturer at a Sons of the Confederate Veterans function. Marksbury has written for the “Confederate Veteran,” a private magazine for Sons of Confederate Veterans members. The Hullabaloo has been unable to confirm if he remains an active member.
In 2016, Marksbury appeared on WGSO’s Battle of New Orleans program following the former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke, discussing the Andrew Jackson monument and the lawsuit Marksbury filed against former New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu. The aforementioned video has since been deleted. The account, BattleNolaRadio, posted the video to Youtube on Sept. 29, 2016.
When interviewed by The New York Times, Marksbury said that Duke had “minimal” involvement in the monument affair.
Described by former colleagues as “professional” and “nice,” Marksbury received significant national press coverage for having filed suit against Landrieu in 2017 to stop the removal of a statue of Confederate General P.G.T. Beauregard.
As part of his efforts to stop the removal of Confederate monuments, Marksbury was introduced as a School of Liberal Arts professor when he appeared on Jeff Crouere’s “Politics with a Punch” television show. On air, he denied any link between Confederate monuments and Dylann Roof’s massacre in Charleston besides the timing of the two incidents. In the aftermath of the shooting at Emanuel AME Church, there was a national outcry over Roof’s veneration of Confederate monuments.That outcry prompted the removal of monuments across the country, including in New Orleans.
Marksbury wrote an academic paper, “A New Great Awakening: The Threat to New Orleans’s Confederate Monuments,” where he asked in reference to Confederate monuments: “What will happen to our country’s heritage, the good and the bad, if its symbolic landscapes can be so easily destroyed when a previous minority group becomes the new majority?”
In 2017, Marksbury presented a lecture called “The History of P.G.T. Beauregard,” in St. Bernard Parish. Marksbury suggested that Beauregard was an advocate of civil rights for freed slaves. Tulane former chair and current professor in the history department Randy Sparks said to the contrary, “Beauregard’s support of civil rights for former slaves was not genuine or not in simple terms. It was part of the complicated politics of Reconstruction New Orleans where [Beauregard’s] faction hoped to lure [Black] voters away from the Republican Party.” Beauregard’s effort failed, in part, because “Blacks saw through it and refused to support it.”
After Marksbury also said that Beauregard never “bought or sold slaves,” Sparks said that the statement “may be technically true. But what we are talking about [is] slave ownership, and Beauregard certainly owned slaves. He certainly inherited, and I assume, also gained, ownership of others.”
In his lecture on Beauregard, Marksbury also said that Orleans Parish “still tries to force employers to hire a certain percent of Blacks on any construction jobs they have.”
Marksbury may have been referring to the City of New Orleans’ State and Local Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program, which seeks to give a certain percentage of city contracts to disadvantaged individuals. Beau Tidwell, director of communications for New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell, said that “there is not a ‘hiring quota’ or a mandate singling out any specific racial or minority group.”
In a 2017 interview with NOLA.com, Marksbury is introduced as an expert in the field of Southern Confederate monuments. Sparks, a Southern historian, said that “so far as I know, Marksbury is an anthropologist, with a specialty in South Asia. I don’t know what about that makes him an expert in Southern history, culture and monuments.” While Marksbury holds a bachelor’s degree in history, Marksbury’s academic field is South Asian studies and his doctorate is in anthropology.
Marksbury was also a member of the Monument Removal Committee, which submitted recommendations to Mayor Cantrell on Confederate monuments in New Orleans. Mayor Cantrell has previously said that “[her] plan is to work with those who care about [the statues] and come up with a plan that [she] could support.”
“This group did not formally work for the City or for the administration, and they were neither created nor appointed by Mayor Cantrell,” Tidwell said.
Contrary to Tidwell’s statement, committee records obtained via a public records request by The Times-Picayune showed that members indicated they were “entrusted [by the Mayor] with the charge of considering various sites for [Confederate] monuments.”
In those same records, Marksbury is also appointed as spokesperson of the committee. One committee member, Sally Reeves, asked Marksbury if he had tenure at Tulane before voting to approve Marksbury as spokesperson.
Reeves told The Hullabaloo that her question was intended to establish whether Marksbury would be protected from termination. Reeves said she believed Marksbury would be punished for his work on behalf of the committee.
The majority of the Monument Removal Committee, including Marksbury, are also members of the Monumental Task Committee, an organization which in 2016 unsuccessfully fought to keep statues of Confederate President Jefferson Davis and Beauregard from being removed.
Executive Director of Public Relations Mike Strecker, on behalf of Tulane President Mike Fitts and two other administrators, declined to comment on Marksbury’s non-Tulane engagements.
“Richard Marksbury’s activities related to the Monumental Task Committee were conducted as a private citizen. We have no knowledge of the comments you have attributed to him and cannot comment on personnel matters,” Strecker said.
Despite this, Tulane News has linked articles about Marksbury on Tulane’s website as far back as 2017. All linked articles involved Marksbury’s defense of Confederate monuments.
Marksbury did not respond to multiple attempts to contact him and stated to a third party that he would not speak to The Hullabaloo.
Marksbury has also penned numerous letters to the editor of The Times-Picayune, The Advocate and The Mechanicsville Local.
In one letter, he asks, “What evidence supports the statement the South started the war [to] ‘preserve slavery’?” Marksbury used the exact same language in an article he wrote for “Confederate Veterans,” the magazine of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.
Civil War historians widely agree that slavery, “more than any other issue,” was the root cause of the Civil War. Sparks told The Hullabaloo that slavery had “everything” to do with the war.
In a series of similar letters, Marksbury defended “Lost Cause” mythology and argued against the renaming of his alma mater, Lee-Davis High School. He signed all the letters as “Richard A. Marksbury, PhD.” Marksbury is the only doctorate-holding individual named Richard A. Marksbury in the U.S. that The Hullabaloo could locate via internet search.
Marksbury has been employed by Tulane for 41 years. Marksbury was appointed associate dean of University College — now the School of Professional Advancement — in 1982 and promoted to dean in 1996. The Monumental Task Committee was formed in 1989, and Marksbury is referenced in their literature as recently as 2019.
Marksbury offers two courses for the spring 2021 semester — ASTA 1800: Introduction to Asian Studies and ASTA 3550: Feudal Japan- Samurai Era. Marksbury has taught roughly 30 students per semester since spring of 2019.
Charles Eugene Marsala • May 24, 2021 at 12:07 pm
I am a Tulane Alum, 1982 who went on to become Mayor of Atherton, Ca.
Mr. Tidwell is correct. This “working group” met for 2 months prior to Latoya Cantrell becoming Mayor. Thus is was “Yellow Journalism” for Kevin Litton of the Times-Picayune to falsely claim it was a Mayor appointed committee. It is a “smear-wrap” by the Tulane Hullabaloo to use the false information of Kevin Litton, who is no longer a reporter, as a source…..
Prof Marksbury is correct in his research in that title to the PGT Beauregard statue was never transferred to the city.
cydney • May 8, 2021 at 4:40 pm
first of all, “heritage” is a BLATANT dog whistle for “my family owned slaves and i’m not ashamed about it.” So if you used heritage in your comments, you are racist. you can say you’re not, but you are! and sorry not sorry that i’m “close minded” towards racist people. no one should be open minded about racists and their opinions lmao that’s not a valid opinion. and i would never want civil discourse with someone who supports/supported the confederacy. i will engage in civil discourse with republicans, but not with racist people (which most of you in the comments are). and for the people who say, “well paul tulane was a confederate or whatever,” ok! let’s change the name of tulane university! i’m serious like why is that such a big deal it’s a name. get over it, snowflakes. and to the people saying to just go to a different college, do you not realize every college in america is like this? any college a student is bound to go to will have racist roots. that’s not the students fault. also to the people saying “abolish hullabaloo or this never should have been written” i thought the republican party was the free speech party. to rob, who said that tulane is lucky to have a racist as a professor, do the yourself a favor and turn off tucker carlson. you do know that fox news SUCCESFULLY argued in court that no one who watches fox news actually takes tucker carlson seriously. look it up. to CW Roden, no one forced you to read this whole article idk why you are acting like someone did. to robert S, i don’t even know or care what your frat was. your gpa doesn’t mean anything to anyone lol just here to brag about yourself? to lloyd gross, who said paul tulane would be proud of him, just drive into the ocean. to tom longmire, i don’t care who supported this. every president that has served has committed war crimes and done horrible things. even the democratic ones, who are all centrists at best. robby lee, you should also turn off the fox news. seems like they’ve given you enough brain damage as is. it would be shorter for you to just comment, “i’m a racist,” than the bs you decided to post. not gonna take the time to address all of you, and i know you won’t listen, but you are literally the worst type of person to exist. you are bigoted. you are terrible terrible people who i hope don’t have a good life. black lives matter and if you don’t believe that, have fun in the “hell” you believe in 🙂
Joseph Gilman • May 6, 2021 at 7:49 pm
Glad my son chose not to go to Tulane, although I am disappointed he will never learn how Andrew Jackson fought
for the Confederacy.
God help us all.
Mr. Rockefeller • May 6, 2021 at 4:20 pm
I guess the next crop of journalists are learning to be as deceptive as our present goose stepping journalists. The title of the article and the content do not square up. There is a big difference between a pro-confederate group which implies racism, and arguing against the destruction of monuments to Southern civil war soldiers. Your deceit is the reason Dr. Marksbury will not contribute to your article. The author and faculty advisor should be ashamed of themselves.
Anon • May 6, 2021 at 11:03 am
If some students are so sensitive about certain issues, perhaps they should have done their research before applying to Tulane. They should leave and find another institution more suited for cry babies. This woke culture is going to be their demise and they are marching lockstep off a cliff. But congratulation to Rohan Goswami and Domenic Mesa for being useful idiots for their brownshirt mentors. You’ve made them proud komrads. And you wonder why The Hullabaloo is swirling the bowl…
How on earth do these children think they are going to function in the real world where not everyone’s a winner? G-d forbid their boss hurt their feelings.
Sonny Lopez • May 5, 2021 at 3:27 pm
Wow, I didn’t know Andrew Jackson fought for the Confederacy, what with him being dead at the time. That Tulane tuition is worth every cent!
Parent of student • May 3, 2021 at 8:37 pm
As a parent of a Tulane undergraduate after reading this poorly written article all I can wonder is what was the purpose of this article? Watching YouTube video’s and Google news searches is not an investigation. I am left to wonder if the authors of this Hit piece have ever interacted with the professor that was the focus of this article? I ask as I suspect that one of them, or a close associate of them, may have received a grade in one of that professor’s classes lower then that they felt was due. In other words, was this ‘investigation’ was more of a grudge then anything else? For the record I am a Yankee, born, raised and still living in New York City and have no associations with any of those groups referred to in this article.
Student • May 3, 2021 at 6:06 pm
@anon I am a tulane undergrad that is neither old nor delusional and I think this article is BS and an attack on diversity of thought. Stop trying to invalidate people’s views based on som subjective inferred stereotype.
Anon • May 3, 2021 at 8:47 am
All old delusional alums in these comments. Undergrads at Tulane deserve to know who their professors are if they want to present themselves as history professors if they are out in public boldly denying facts of American history. Great article.
Dee Dupont • May 2, 2021 at 10:35 pm
This is cherry picked and massaged propaganda. Pro Confederate groups? Lol. They are memorials to the dead Louisiana volunteers most of whom did not return home but were buried (if lucky) where they fell. The amount of factual history missing from this inflammatory article is mind boggling. I know Walter Issacson likes to refer to “Jim Crow” era monuments (in fact Memorials) but Jim Crow was not a “southern thing” but had it’s origin in 1838 Boston separating races by color in railcars from Boston to Salem but I guess Tulane leaves that undisputed fact out in their History classes. Not to mention that the total decimation of the south, including New Orleans, caused a long delay in monetary fund raising to memorialize collectively their son’s sacrifice in service to their state’s call. Survival was the main concern for years to thereafter. I could go on with many more “inconvenient” facts that Tulane undoubtedly leaves out of it’s education/indoctrination program. Try studying the research of Dr John Hope Franklin, an African American History Professor (Harvard/Duke) who studied the 1860 New Orleans census records. Then you will see what segment of the New Orleans citizenry were the largest slave holders at that time. Or try reading the research of Dr Walter Williams, another African American Professor, regarding the reasons for southern succession. Honorable Professors who sincerely sought the truth no matter where it lead. This and so much more clearly bares witness to the politically driven agenda of education at Tulane. Withholding, editing and massaging facts passes for education now at Tulane. Riding on it’s reputation from years gone by, Tulane has turned into a bad parody of itself by progressive professors who promulgate a political agenda driven education in lieu of actual unbiased factual research into truth. Too many injected mind reading assumptions of historical figures in this “article” as they have obviously been predetermined to be worthy of vilifying and to be portrayed as contemptible as possible. Disingenuous indoctrination at it’s finest. Thank God Andrew Breitbart escaped his programming at Tulane.
Bernard E.J. Cyrus, Jr. • May 2, 2021 at 12:26 pm
I previously was disconnected after writing a review of the attack on Dean Marksbury. So I am making it short and sweet. Suffice it to say I challenge the university to allow myself and others a rebuttal to this diatribe as a descendent of slaves , Confederates and Inion soldiers. Also, a Civil War researcher and writer. I will speck to any group anytime with facts not conjecture as I have read in the Sparks declarations.
Concerned Student • May 2, 2021 at 11:25 am
Abolish the Hullabaloo! This is slander, what happened to diversity of thought?
Rob • May 2, 2021 at 10:15 am
Tulane is lucky to have a Professor like Marksbury. All of the people critical of the confederacy should leave Tulane and never come back
S. Carpenter • May 1, 2021 at 10:15 pm
Only racists defend and maintain the Confederacy. Students deserve a professor that doesn’t defend white supremacy. Simple! 🙂
C.W. Roden • May 1, 2021 at 2:22 pm
What a long and boring piece of nothing. So what if the guy is a member of the SCV, last time I checked that group is not listed as an extremist of hate group by anyone with any serious credibility.
Former Hullabaloo editor • May 1, 2021 at 9:44 am
Sounds like you are the racist ones. Can’t imagine my editor-in-chief would have ever allowed such trash to be published. Maybe that’s why we won Pacemaker Awards every year. And we were putting out a paper three times the size of the rag you publish now. This is just another reason I no longer donate to my alma mater.
Raymond Henderson • May 1, 2021 at 7:18 am
Tulane University itself is a Confederate Monument, the name, the traditions, the endowment funds etc. If you are supporting the attacks on this professor and attend Tulane, your hypocrisy is showing
Rob • Apr 30, 2021 at 10:14 pm
There’s nothing wrong belonging to a heritage organization like the Sons of Confederate Veterans (SCV). President Harry Truman was a member of SCV too and Confederates were praised and supported by US Presidents, VPs, Senators, descendants of our Founding Fathers, etc.
The Sons of Confederate Veterans is a hereditary organization that is just as legitimate as the Mayflower, Revolutionary war, etc descendants orgs. They are descendants of good Americans who fought defending their homes in the deadliest war in US history and have every right to attend. Banning them because of their heritage and ancestors is the peak of discrimination.
America is beginning to resemble Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.
Hoyle Vinson • Apr 30, 2021 at 9:42 pm
This article is full of hate and innuendo. It only supplies opinion and half truths and very few facts.
I would like to know at what time did Roof defend monuments?
If this is what passes for journalism today then journalism is doomed.
Robert Shofstahl • Apr 30, 2021 at 3:57 pm
I read with disappointment the Tulane Hullabaloo article, but am not surprised seeing the direction that the school is leading its students. Yes, I am one of those old Tulanian graduates, but I believe I have the credentials to respond with credibility. I am one of the old graduates referred to in one of the responses supporting the Hullabaloo’s attack on Professor Marksbury , but I am also a Phi Beta Kappa, and 3.7/4.0 grade point graduate. I graduated cum laude when Tulane did not show any other thing that other universities do such as magna cum laude and summa cum laude. Tulane was always pretty liberal in its views, but when I went there they allowed and encouraged differing views. That apparently is no longer the case, according to what is written in the Hullabaloo and accepted by the administration. I have seen the direction the university has gone for some time now, and now that its position has been made a topic on national media, I am embarrassed to tell anyone that I was a Tulane Grad. I had quit giving to the school for several years after perceiving the further singular direction the school is headed.
Anonymous - BK • Apr 30, 2021 at 12:35 pm
I graduated in 2015 and took two of Professor Marksbury’s classes. He was one of the best teachers I had at Tulane. I am a person of color and I never felt uncomfortable in his classes. He staid on the subject and never injected anything that showed a bias toward any group. Others have called this hit job and it is one. The “investigation” by the individuals who wrote this article is more than lacking. Sit at computer, read some articles and then publish something that represents poor and slanted journalism.
B • Apr 30, 2021 at 11:48 am
Imagine showing up to an article that debunks the Lost Cause argument…and then arguing in favor of the lost cause. Amazing. The lack of self awarness is almost captivating.
It’s always some old Tulane alum showing up to say they don’t approve of the newspaper. I tend not to visit websites that do nothing but make me angry, but here are alums showing up within hours of an article being published to complain about marxism or hunter biden or whatever. Do y’all have notifications turned on or something? What strange anger fuels you?
The comments show that this article is actually important. People are out here defending the lost cause, among other things, which are blatently wrong and harmful. If this professor can leverage his platform to spread this sort of stuff, why can’t the authors use theirs to rebutt it? Furthermore, if you say this was well-known, how could it possibly be a hit piece? Are students not allowed to give their opnions when teachers spread blatent misinformation? Last I checked, part of free speech was that we are allowed to respond to others speech.
Old White Man • Apr 30, 2021 at 11:09 am
I am so mad I am going to spend my entire day writing a thesis in the comments section of an article. I do not have a job and my wife hates me. I will probably never have sex again in my life. Toodles
Anonymous Two • Apr 30, 2021 at 10:13 am
While I support this professor’s first amendment rights to hold his own views and share them, no matter how idiotic they are, I believe the point of the Hullabaloo’s writing of this article has been proven by the people coming to this man’s defense in the comments. This man has assumed or impersonated the role of an expert in a field that he has no expertise in, for decades. His academic peers who actually specialize in “his (claimed) field” say that information he has shared is factually wrong. Yet, some of the geniuses in the comments opt to attack “close-minded” liberals, all the while unaware that they are exposing and demonstrating for all to see their own “closed-mindedness.”
While you may hold certain views on certain topics privately, when you share those views publicly, you open yourself to criticism. It is the writers’ right to express these opinions publicly on the things that this professor has said publicly, just as this professor has the right to express his opinions. It is not evidence of a “woke” liberal society if you disagree with an opinion. This is the other part of the first amendment: it does NOT only apply to you. And, as the old adage goes, “it’s better to keep your mouth shut and have everyone think you’re stupid than to open your mouth and confirm their suspicions.”
Now, this article does come off as a hit job (rightfully so; I think students have the right to know about potential biases of their professors against them). Additionally, this article does not offer any information about whether this professor’s views have had an impact on his roles at Tulane. Of course, the Hullabaloo probably does not have access to this information, but the authors could have made an effort to find previous students of his and ask their opinions. Regardless, I would have appreciated a disclaimer in the sense of fairness that it is unknown whether this professor has let his personal views impact his professional life (the comment of the Tulane administrator is relevant here – he was acting as a private citizen when he expressed his opinions). If you can’t prove this, then you are essentially just attacking a man for his own personal political opinion (he does have a right to have one). You have a responsibility to report the whole story. I do not think the purpose of this publication is to dox people with fringe opinions for fun; however, this is essentially what you’ve done here if you cannot prove that this man’s views have impacted his responsibilities at Tulane.
Lloyd Gross • Apr 30, 2021 at 10:08 am
Marksbury should be promoted to department head. Paul Tulane would be proud of that.
Tom Longmire • Apr 30, 2021 at 9:43 am
“Where has all this hate and intolerance for the Confederacy come from? The current Confederaphobia is worse than as any homophobia or xenophobia or Islamophobia. Even Confederate cemeteries are being desecrated.”
“Most all presidents have supported veterans on both sides of the Civil War: Woodrow Wilson attended the 50th Gettysburg reunion in 1913; FDR attended the 75th Gettysburg reunion in 1938 and dedicated a monument to Robert E Lee in Dallas; Harry Truman was a member of the SCV and he, a Southern, desegregated the “Union” military in 1948; Dwight Eisenhower kept a picture of Robert E Lee in the Oval Office; JFK celebrated the 100th anniversary of the war in 1961; Richard Nixon planned to attend the dedication of the Stone Mountain carving in 1970 but, due to the Kent State shooting, Spiro Agnew went in his place; Gerald Ford reinstated Robert E Lee’s citizenship in 1976; Jimmy Carter reinstated Jefferson Davis’ citizenship in 1978; Bill Clinton congratulated the UDC on their 100th anniversary in 1994; and even Barack Obama credited the Confederacy with the origins of Memorial Day in 2010.”
Joe Biden voted in favor of restoring Robert E Lee and Jefferson Davis’ citizenships in the 1970’s. Mitch Landrieu, as Lt. Governor, welcomed the Sons of Confederate Veterans to New Orleans for their annual convention in 2006.
The WAR itself was not about freeing slaves, at least not for two years. In his 1st inaugural address Lincoln stated, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists …” (it wasn’t about slavery). He later stated, “The power confided to me will be used to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the government, and to collect the duties and imposts …” (it was about money). In that speech he also stated his support for the fugitive slave law and Corwin amendment, which would have enshrined slavery in the US Constitution. Lincoln restated this in his first message to Congress on July 4, 1861.
Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation only freed slaves in the South, but specifically excluded New Orleans. In it Lincoln stated that it was “war measure” and a “military necessity”.
Gavin • Apr 30, 2021 at 8:14 am
Tulane Staff, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone who read it is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Anonymous One • Apr 30, 2021 at 7:29 am
The comment by the Tulane staff is concerning to say the least. The article is obviously a hit job. Therein lies the the problem. I graduated from Tulane in the 60s. It was liberal then but liberal in those days is clearly not the liberals of today. Tulane has become one of the most far left radical universities in the country. It is a university which no longer recognizes diversity of political thought and does not promote civil discourse on political issues. Now it is simply an institution of wokeness literally unrecognizable from its past. The most recent example is inviting Hunter Biden. What a disgrace! And if you look at the speakers list of the invitees you will not find a single conservative or even a moderate on the forum. That is why there is a ground swell of former Tulane graduates that believe fundamental changes in the Administration of Tulane must be made. In short, Tulane’s exclusion of any thought that opposes the far left agenda at Tulane is grounds for cleaning house.
Robby Lee • Apr 30, 2021 at 6:46 am
Since when is supporting one’s heritage a crime? Why do liberals think they can decide whose heritage is more important? (For the record, I would support a group who stood for honor, courage, and defense of home and family over the side that burned, looted, raped and pillage the people of the south, but if those are your idols, that’s your personal moral problem, not mine).
I love how one commenter said a college is for the open expression of ideas. LOL. Unless it doesn’t go along with their demented way of thinking. By the way, the first slave owner is America was a BLACK man and all slaves were captured and sold to white people by blacks in Africa. Just a few facts that I know you don’t want to get in the way of your whackadoodle crazy, close-minded ideology.
Liberalism is a mental disease and there is no sense trying to talk common sense to people who possess none.
Renee Sullivan • Apr 30, 2021 at 6:41 am
Good for Marksbury for standing up for his Southern Heritage. If the authors of this article and those behind the “investigation” think that pro-Confederate groups like the SCV are “racist” organizations, they are part of the problem in our country today! Makes one wonder why students and faculty at Tulane are learning and being taught to be racist, judgmental adults and why they are being taught to stereotype and hate anyone who believes differently from them! This article and investigation indicate the “woke” liberal attempt to turn a false National narrative into truth and disregard facts. The investigation should prompt a lawsuit for the attempt to damage the character of Marksbury and the attempt to interfere with his first amendment rights, as we as his career. History matters and should be taught correctly in colleges and universities across the country without a false or twisted national narrative meant to destroy anything or anyone who does not support lies that have been perpetuated by those who win the war. A simple review of actual historical documents would prove the basis of this comment to be correct and the goal of the article and investigation to be bogus period!
John Collins • Apr 30, 2021 at 6:07 am
Just more proof of how bad these marxist indoctrination centers are and how much damage they are doing to our children!
Ellen H. • Apr 29, 2021 at 11:36 pm
I’m disappointed that Tulane PR, President Fitts and 2 administrators didn’t jump at the opportunity to distance themselves from these opinions (these opinions don’t reflect the values of Tulane etc.) and instead hid behind the personal nature of these activities.
That didn’t stop Prof. Rev. Dino Cinel (RIP) from termination when his adolescent porn videos were discovered in his off campus rectory room and aired on Geraldo! (circa early 1980s). I agree that these opinions are not illegal and he has every legal right to them. I would hope that Tulane could hold Professors and especially heads of departments to ethical standards, the same way we were held to them when we signed the blue book honor code. I want to be proud to be a Tulane alum. Information like this makes it difficult.
Cliff Page, Jr. • Apr 29, 2021 at 11:22 pm
This article is a pure smear campaign and very close if not libel against a man because he stands in support of the Confederacy and monuments and memorials to Confederate leaders and Veterans. Shame on the ignorant hides of this author and this rag for publishing such Black racist propaganda. It is outrageous that the author associates the taking down of Confederate monuments and memorials with the misguided sentiments of Dillon Roof. It is historical fact that the “Take em Down Movement” is a 50+-year-old effort that has its nexus in the national headquarters of the NAACP in Baltimore. It is the NAACP that has been engaged in the slander of all symbols of the Confederacy and the removal of all such symbols. It has developed a strategic plan and promotes its objectives via well-orquestrated means to promote black supremacy and divide this nation for racist purposes, and for pecuniary purposes.
America today is in the grips of a Maoist Cultural Revolution in which the proletariat has been replaced with American society’s natural underdog the Black race. But this new definition is underscored by Black Power and the overworked agenda of inclusion and diversity (two oxymorons that cancel each other out.). It is a shame that the Black community, often admitted into the student body of universities today by social promotion and racial set-asides and minority weighted admissions, rather than by a merit system of entrance and achievement.
Terry DeFee • Apr 29, 2021 at 11:19 pm
If America was right in 1776, The Confederates were right in 1861. Get over yourself. If the South wanted slavery in perpetuity, all they had to do was to agree with Lincoln’s offer via the Corwin amendment. Rejoin the union and pay taxes. That is what the union wanted, tax dollars! The Son’s of Confederate Veterans is a pro freedom group. All are welcome to join. Over 400,000 blacks have been murdered by blacks in the last 100 year’s. yet you are worried about a pro freedom group? 78% black illegitimacy in the black community. 85% of black women are overweight, 58% morbidly obese. 200 blacks killed by police every year, 400 whites. Quit playing the victim and accept responsibility for yourselves. This applies to all races….
Southern Professor • Apr 29, 2021 at 11:19 pm
I’m appalled that a History Professor would actually try to teach and protect History..
Clayton Williamson • Apr 29, 2021 at 10:56 pm
You need a damn lot more professors like him
Historian • Apr 29, 2021 at 10:27 pm
First off, Tulane is named in honor of and started by a Confederate !!! Lol.
In fact, Mr. Tulane was the largest donor in all of Southern Louisiana to the Confederacy. The man is a professor at Tulane. These cancel culture people who are trying to get him fired for suggesting they should leave confederate memorials to dead state veterans alone…for crying out loud people. Understand your history, the man is correct number 1….and number 2 he works for a school that you all are trying to get him fired from that is literally named in a honor of a confederate. Grow up.
Tulane Staff • Apr 29, 2021 at 6:52 pm
To the commenters questioning the importance of this conversation – it is worth acknowledging that this is not widespread information. Further, while you might not see this as “news,” Tulane as an institution is committed to becoming more inclusive and recognizing the cultural legacy of White Supremacy in our country within that value framework, this qualifies as news. You may not have been raised in a time and place where the Confederacy was considered to enshrine such beliefs, but many of younger generations have and they see our hypocrisy when we say we aren’t Racist but then express such anger over their right to discuss it openly. They did not grow up with the same systematized segregation as many born before 1970 did. The media discourse has shifted and it may feel uncomfortable for us to a hear a different side of the story that we are used to. However, before we choose to degrade an author or a piece of their work – perhaps begin with asking yourself, ” Why do the worlds of a college student evoke such a strong reaction of anger in my body?” As a person of faith, I find myself surprised by the way that we harden our hearts when the power of Spirit is calling us to listen to voices of all background and see that perhaps our cultural heritage has harmed us all. In my opinion, this is expanding the boundaries of our history and encourages all Tulanians to become more willing to accept the reality of how our past actions have hurt our hearts rather than to continue to ignore Truth and evade accountability.
Anonymous • Apr 29, 2021 at 6:45 pm
This has all been written before. Old news. But, how many businesses have the pro-monument supporters burned and looted in the last few years? These up and coming leftists should research that and maybe the future, fake news students can write about Marxist groups burning down cities.
RN • Apr 29, 2021 at 4:03 pm
This is the biggest nothing burger article I’ve read in a while. Clearly a mean spirited attempt to smear a man’s character for no other reason than petty vindictiveness. Headline should more accurately read, “Capable Professor Dares To Have Personal Opinion On Culture & History That Deviates From Corporate/Political Establishment.”
My goodness, imagine taking yourself seriously as a journalist and spending time and energy producing hit pieces on people who broke no laws, maligned no person (or student for that matter), and has a long established track record of affably interacting with those around them. This. This is exactly why there exists such a widespread disdain and mistrust in American media in general, school paper or not. The authors and editors should be ashamed, but they clearly don’t possess any awareness of such a character trait.
Even More Anonymous • Apr 29, 2021 at 1:44 pm
Anonymous, It was never a secret that Marksbury had interests in monuments. This article doesn’t uncover anything new. Nothing shocking here except the fact that Tulane students are even more closed minded than when I was there.
Anonymous • Apr 29, 2021 at 10:22 am
William Klein, you‘re embarrassing yourself. Don’t you think students deserve to know if their professor has ties to pro-Confederate groups and believes in the lost cause myth? If you‘re so fussed about Hunter Biden, do the research and write an article about it. But don‘t undermine the serious allegations put forth in this one. I for one thank the authors for bringing this information to light, which is exactly what journalism is supposed to do.
William B. Klein • Apr 29, 2021 at 9:17 am
Why is this news worthy? Is this some lame attempt at getting a professor in trouble? Perhaps an article on Tulane giving a job to influence peddler and future felon Hunter Biden would be more interesting.
Edward Henri Sebesta • Apr 29, 2021 at 9:02 am
Marksbury wrote angry emails to me. I am a co-editor of two books about the neo-Confederate movement. You can find me on Amazon.com. Glad to see this is finally coming out.