College campuses are, in theory, meant to serve as environments where future leaders and innovators pursue higher education while developing into well-rounded, independent thinkers. Central to this mission is the expectation that universities foster open dialogue — spaces where diverse opinions, values and perspectives can be expressed, challenged and refined through critical inquiry.
In practice, however, many across our nation have diverged from this ideal. Rather than encouraging intellectual diversity, universities have become “battlegrounds for ideology,” where free speech is constrained and dissenting viewpoints — particularly those outside the political left — are met with hostility. On university campuses across this country, non-left perspectives are discouraged, sanctioned or publicly shamed. As a result, many students remain silent, fearing social ostracization, academic consequences or institutional backlash.
It was in response to this reality that Charlie Kirk, a Conservative political activist, founded Turning Point USA in 2012. TPUSA is a national nonprofit organization created to challenge what Kirk described as left-wing ideological dominance on high school and college campuses and to increase conservative engagement among young people. He also hosted campus debates designed to confront ideological opponents directly.
Today, TPUSA operates on hundreds of campuses nationwide, engaging students through chapter programming, public discourse and speaker events. A defining feature of TPUSA’s expansion has been its ability to normalize conservative identity on campus. By providing organizational structure and community, TPUSA offers social and institutional support to students who might otherwise feel isolated or marginalized for holding non-left viewpoints.
The organization also positions itself as a defender of free speech, particularly when conservative expression is restricted or penalized, using those conflicts to expose institutional bias and spark broader conversations about viewpoint neutrality in higher education.
At Tulane, the goal of TPUSA is to promote civil dialogue. Our chapter aims to restore an environment where students of all political affiliations can engage in challenging conversations in a respectful and civil manner, because when people stop talking, that’s when violence happens.
The persistent demonization of Conservatives by the media has normalized hostility towards dissenting political views. Across the country, individuals have been threatened, harassed and silenced simply for holding different values or ideologies. Political violence and threats against figures such as President Donald Trump and Kirk have become more frequent. A troubling pattern has emerged in which many of these acts are carried out by radicalized young men, underscoring how vulnerable college-aged individuals are to ideological extremism. This reality makes the role of campus organizations like TPUSA not just relevant, but critical.
This political divide cannot be allowed to continue unchecked, and addressing it must begin on college campuses, the institutions responsible for shaping the intellectual habits of the next generation. Universities are the factories where future leaders, policymakers and professionals are formed. If intolerance toward dissent is normalized here, it will be exported into every sector of society.
Welcoming TPUSA reflects Tulane’s commitment to viewpoint diversity and real-world readiness. Universities do not strengthen democracy by narrowing the range of acceptable ideas. They strengthen it by teaching students how to confront disagreement without fear.
Noam Gracia serves as president of Tulane University’s chapter of Turning Point USA.

K • Jan 30, 2026 at 11:02 am
It is extremely dishonest to claim that conservatives on campuses nationwide are “marginalized” in any way. As a matter of fact, it’s the complete opposite: a conservative student at the University of Oklahoma was ultimately rewarded for submitting an elementary-school level transphobic “essay” in a college-level course. TPUSA has also made a name for itself via attacking communities of those who are genuinely marginalized, such as racial minorities and members of the LGBTQ community. White Christian nationalists have never once been oppressed in their lives, and it is laughably unintelligent to claim otherwise.
Harry • Jan 29, 2026 at 6:10 pm
You don’t give killers and fascists a platform period. The way you’ve bent your knee to Trump is embarrassing. I’ll never give you a penny again.
Mike Hawk • Jan 30, 2026 at 10:22 am
sounds like someone is triggered
Fed Up & Queer • Jan 29, 2026 at 4:25 pm
The central flaw in this op-ed is its insistence on portraying conservative students as uniquely silenced while ignoring the very real power dynamics and lived consequences that shape whose voices are actually at risk on campus. As an LGBTQ person, I do not experience political disagreement as an abstract intellectual exercise. When organizations like Turning Point USA promote speakers and rhetoric that question the legitimacy of queer identities, oppose protections for trans students, and support policies that strip LGBTQ people of basic rights, that speech is not merely “dissenting.” It directly affects whether students like me feel safe, respected, and fully included in our own university. Framing resistance to that rhetoric as “intolerance” or “hostility” is intellectually dishonest. It erases the difference between being challenged for your ideas and being challenged for your humanity. Universities are not failing their mission when they scrutinize movements that routinely undermine the dignity and civil rights of marginalized students. They are fulfilling it.
Moreover, the claim that TPUSA exists primarily to promote “civil dialogue” collapses under even minimal scrutiny of the organization’s national record. TPUSA has repeatedly built its brand through provocation, misinformation, and targeting vulnerable communities for political gain. From amplifying anti-trans moral panics to dismissing systemic racism and LGBTQ discrimination as “ideology,” the organization thrives on manufacturing outrage rather than cultivating good-faith debate. When students object to this, they are not rejecting free speech. They are exercising it. Genuine viewpoint diversity does not require universities to legitimize movements that consistently punch down and misrepresent basic social realities. Democracy is strengthened not by pretending all ideas deserve equal institutional validation, but by teaching students to distinguish between principled disagreement and campaigns that undermine inclusion, evidence, and human dignity. If Tulane is serious about preparing ethical leaders, it should prioritize communities rooted in respect, accountability, and truth, not those that confuse disruption with courage and grievance with scholarship.
Jane • Jan 30, 2026 at 2:07 am
I agree entirely. Violence against marginalized groups has been a constant threat throughout American history and in our present day society. It’s critical to view politics and ideology as systems that cause violence instead of intelectual exercises. The LGBGQ community, along with other communities, has been hurt by TPUSA. We will not give abusers a seat at our table. Debate requires respect, scientific evidence, and accountability.
emily • Jan 29, 2026 at 12:26 pm
did anyone fact check this article? the “radicalized young men” you speak of have all been right wing, not of the left. this is ridiculously privileged and insensitive take, and i implore you to dig deeper on why conservatives may be receiving backlash and criticism for their beliefs. people aren’t hating on conservatives because of a difference in opinions, they’re hating because conservatives are supporting and promoting the murdering, kidnapping, and torture of innocent people and CHILDREN. this is the most lukewarm, brain-dead take I have seen in a minute.