Letter to the Editor: Tulane must not adopt pro-BDS policies
Dear Editor:
As a Tulane alumnus and the former Features Editor and Executive Editor of The Hullabaloo during the early 1970s, I was appalled that the newspaper chose to run a pro-BDS (boycott, divestment and sanction), anti-Israel opinion piece by freshman Dylan Borne.
In making the case for a Tulane academic boycott against Israeli universities, Borne asserted that the New Orleans City Council already supports “Palestine.” This is patently false. The council did suspend its regular rules and passed a non-binding resolution (R-18-5) on Jan. 12 in support of basic human rights without any opportunity for debate nor any specific reference within the four corners of the document to Israel or Palestine. Almost immediately, though, members of the New Orleans Palestine Solidarity Committee trumpeted their belief that the passage of this resolution made New Orleans the first Southern city to pass a pro-BDS measure.
Resolution No. R-18-5 was introduced and voted on by the New Orleans City Council under suspension of the rules and without adequate review and debate. This resolution was ill advised, gratuitous and does not reflect the policy of the City of New Orleans https://t.co/kPgxj8XDyP
— Mitch Landrieu (@MayorLandrieu) January 12, 2018
Two weeks later, at the ensuing meeting of the New Orleans City Council on Jan. 26, Councilmembers Jason Williams and Mayor-Elect LaToya Cantrell publicly voiced their opposition to being labeled as pro-BDS and, after a limited debate, led the council in voting unanimously to withdraw the resolution. (So much for their “support” of Palestine).
Apart from troubling allegations of war crimes and the oppression of the Palestinian people, Borne’s call for the academic boycott included many fallacious and unsubstantiated charges against Tel Aviv University, Ben-Gurion University, Hebrew University, the University of Haifa and Technion Israel Institute of Technology.
For example, Borne alleged that Hebrew University was built “on land stolen in 1968.” What Borne failed to mention was that Hebrew University was founded in 1918 on its original location of Mt. Scopus or that the campus opened its doors in 1925. Hebrew University continued to maintain a viable presence on that site until Jordanian forces surrounded the facility during the 1948 war for independence, at which time the faculty and students were evacuated and the campus was abandoned.
Between 1948 and 1967, Hebrew University opened two other campuses in western Jerusalem, one at Givat Ram and another in the Ein Kerem neighborhood, where a medical campus was founded in partnership with Hadassah. When Jordan was forced to retreat following the Israeli victory in the 1967 Six Day War, the Mt. Scopus campus was restored to Hebrew University.
This was not a land grab at all, but the reclamation of land lost in war decades earlier. Israel did not steal land to build Hebrew University. It recaptured its former campus – the spoils of war, if you will – and paid for that with the lives and sweat of its armed forces.
Borne also condemned Israel’s security fence, built in 2002, calling it an “Apartheid Wall.” No matter what one calls it, the number of Israel’s citizens put in harm’s way from sniper attacks or homicide bombs has dropped from a high of 1,000 innocents slaughtered and many thousands more injured to just a few deaths and injuries per year. In fact, most terrorist acts these days come from isolated stabbing or ramming attacks because these very security measures have proved to be very effective in stemming the tide of “soft target” terrorist acts.
Technion’s assistance in helping implement this “Security Fence” should be commended, not vilified, for helping to save hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent lives.
“Hamas is not the only culprit. Israel, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority also share blame. But it is Hamas that has turned Gaza into a military staging area at the expense… https://t.co/1gqyHZsTOM
— Tulane for Israel (@TUforIsrael) April 4, 2018
In summary, I see no reason for Tulane to sever its ties to respected Israeli academic institutions or for it to weigh in on the Israel-Palestine conflict at all. It is a sad commentary that many proponents of BDS claim they advocate for peace and human rights, but offer no such support for Israelis who also desire peace and security. Let us carefully consider the consequences of aligning our own hallowed institution with those of terrorist organizations like Hamas in Gaza, who advocate for continued violence in the Middle East and the destabilization and, ultimately, the destruction of Israel.
Alan Smason (College of Tulane, 1975)
To submit a Letter to the Editor, email it to [email protected].
Leave a Comment
Your donation will support the student journalists of Tulane University. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.
Edward Brownlow • Apr 8, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Nice to see Alan Smason’s sensible response to the original piece. It puzzles me how I read about the increasing test scores and better quality of student admissions to our alma mater every year and, yet, end up reading poorly researched and/or supported articles within the Hullaballoo. While I find myself rationalizing away a lot of what I come across as due to the naivete of youth – Smason’s deconstruction of the author’s points seems to speak more to a lack of concern for the rigorous analysis people should undertake before putting pen to paper.
Ed Brownlow
BSM, AB Freeman School of Business, 1989
beer baron • Apr 7, 2018 at 4:30 pm
We can all agree that Israel is a shining star of freedom in a region, sadly, largely devoid of it.
In truth, Israel is a veritable social justice Shangri-La compared to the rest of the Arab Middle East.
Karryn • Apr 7, 2018 at 4:23 pm
Thank you so much for writting! I appreciate your devotion to Tulane and your ability to use facts to back up every argument. My friends and I were disgusted that the Hullabaloo published Dylan’s article.